KAFIRON KA KUFR

many of the  scholars  refuted Ibn tamiyyah and which wahabis quoted later turned away from their previous viewpoint and went to the extent of labeling Ibn Taymiyyah with Kufr, one such example is of Mullah Ali Qari (rah) who in his later work i.e. Sharh ash-Shifa accepted Ibn Taymiyyah to be indulged in Kufr. However this time our motive will be to expose Ibn Taymiyyah from his own writings so that the blind lovers of Ibn Taymiyyah are left with no excuse to defend this Mubtadi.

Ibn Taymiyyah compared Allah’s existence to that of Moon/Sun

Let us first see this beautiful hadith of Bukhari:

Volume 1, Book 12, Number 720: (Sahih Bukhari)

Narrated Ibn ‘Umar:The Prophet saw expectoration in the direction of the Qibla of the mosque while he was leading the prayer, and scratched it off. After finishing the prayer, he said, “Whenever any of you is in prayer ”HE SHOULD KNOW THAT ALLAH IS IN FRONT OF HIM” . So none should spit in front of him in the prayer.”

** This hadith goes against the Aqida of Ibn Taymiyyah so here is complete quote from Sharh al Aqida al Wastiyyah (Translated by Muhammad Rafiq Khan, Published by leading Salafi Publishing house i.e. Dar us Salam and I have the book right infront of me)**

Ibn Taymiyyah compared Allah to Moon/Sun

Sheikh ul Islam has said in Al-Aqeedatul Hamawiyah that the hadith is true in its manifest meaning that Allah the Exalted is over the Throne and that He is ” IN FRONT OF THE FACE OF THE WORSHIPPER” This attribute is in fact proved for the “CREATURE ALSO” that if man prays to the heavens or to the “SUN OR THE MOON” then heaven, the sun and the moon will be “ABOVE HIM AND ALSO IN FRONT OF HIS FACE” 
.

Reference: Sharh al Aqida al Wastiyyah, Page No. 140 – Last Paragraph

Here Ibn Taymiyyah is putting Allah and the creation on par and saying that just like Sun and Moon also come in-front of us similarly Allah is above the heaven but also comes in-front of us… Audhobillah Min Dhalik!! This concept is directly against Surah al-Ikhlaas which states: “And there is none comparable unto Him. (112:4)

And also against this Quranic ayah: (He is) the Creator of the heavens and the earth:He has made for you pairs from among yourselves, and pairs among cattle: by this means does He multiply you: ”THERE IS NOTHING WHATEVER LIKE UNTO HIM”and He is the One that hears and sees (all things).(42:11)

If Salafis are persistent to defend Ibn Taymiyyah then I ask them to prove Ibn Taymiyyah’s repentance from this concept.

Now let me come towards the second great blunder made by Ibn Taymiyyah, It is often said that Ibn Taymiyyah was Ghustakh (degrader) of Prophet (Peace be upon him) and his Ahlul Bayt, now there are variety of issues where he has gone over the board and disrespected the Prophet, for example his rejection of Waseela is also a Ghustakhi but I will not talk about such issues because on this people can argue but I will give a proof which will prove that Ibn Taymiyyah “OPENED ALL DOORS OF DISRESPECT IN COURT OF PROPHET” and nobody before him had ever made such vulgar claims!

He forbade travel to Qabr Shareef of Prophet

Ibn Taymiyyah forbade “TRAVELLING TO VISIT THE GRAVE OF PROPHET (PEACE BE UPON HIM)” yes hear it again, Ibn Taymiyyah forbade travelling to visit the grave of Prophet. Now being Muslims you would be wondering how could someone forbid the visit to grave of Prophet which is amongst the holiest of Muslim places? A place for which we can die and spend our whole lives just to have a glimpse of it.

Ibn Taymiyyah being hasty in hadith (as approved even by Albani) used this hadith as proof:

Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “Do not set out on a journey except for three Mosques i.e. Al-Masjid-AI-Haram, the Mosque of Allah’s Apostle , and the Mosque of Al-Aqsa, (Mosque of Jerusalem).”[Sahih Bukhari 2:281]

And he claimed that travelling to visit the grave of Prophet (Peace be upon him) is Haram (Naudhobillah), now this is proof of utter ignorance because If this hadith is taken literally then travelling of any sort to other places would become Haram, for example travelling for trade, travelling for seeking knowledge, Jihad etc…

Regarding this outrageous fatwa of Ibn Taymiyyah Imam Ibn Hajr al Asqalani (rah) said in his magnificent Fath ul Bari Sharh Sahih ul Bukhari:

ابن تيمية بتحريم شد الرحل إلى زيارة قبر سيدنا رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم وأنكرنا صورة ذلك، وفي شرح ذلك من الطرفين طول، وهي من أبشع المسائل المنقولة عن ابن تيمية

Translation: Ibn Taymiyyah declared it haram to travel for visitng the grave of Sayyidna Rusul Ullah (صلى الله عليه وسلم ), and of shorterning the prayer there. (Ibn Hajr al Asqalani said): “THIS IS THE UGLIEST MATTER EVER REPORTED FROM IBN TAYMIYYAH” [Ibn Hajr al Asqalani, Fath ul Bari Sharh Sahih ul Bukhari, Volume No.3, Page No. 386, Published by Dar ul Fikr, Beirut, Lebanon]

Imam Ibn Hajr’s strong refutation of Ibn Taymiyyah

Then after analyzing this matter deeply Imam Ibn Hajr al Asqalani (rah) said:

فيبطل بذلك قول من منع شد الرحال إلى زيارة القبر الشريف وغيره من قبور الصالحين والله أعلم

Translation: The Qawl of him is proven Batil (فيبطل) who says it is forbidden to make journey towards ‘’Qabr Shareef’’ and other “GRAVES OF SALIHEEN (قبور الصالحين)”[ibid]

Before I write Sharh of that hadith from other Shariheen, I want to ask all Salafis whether Ibn Taymiyyah was Bidati or Imam Ibn Hajr al Asqalani (rah) who called this “THE UGLIEST MATTER EVER REPORTED FROM IBN TAYMIYYAH” and even allowed travelling to visit graves of other Saliheen was bidati?

Imam Jalal ud din Suyuti (rah), the Mujaddad of his time said: Except for these 3 mosques other mosques should not be travelled ‘’for attaining more thawaab’’, however to visit the Qabr of a Salih (righteous man) and travelling for other purposes is not included in this prohibition, this is known from riwaya of Musnad Ahmed which states that the Prophet (Peace be upon him) said: To set out on a journey towards any mosque “FOR PRAYING SALAAT” there is not allowed except for Masjid ul Harram, Masjid al Aqsa and mine. [Imam Jalal ud-din Suyuti, Sharah Sunnan Ibn Majah (1/102)]

Imam Nawawi (rah) beautifully said:

قال القاضي : وقوله صلى الله عليه وسلم : ( وهو يأرز إلى المدينة ) معناه أن الإيمان أولا وآخرا بهذه الصفة لأنه في أول الإسلام كان كل من خلص إيمانه وصح إسلامه أتى المدينة , إما مهاجرا مستوطنا , وإما متشوقا إلى رؤية رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ومتعلما منه ومتقربا ثم بعده هكذا في زمن الخلفاء كذلك , ولأخذ سيرة العدل منهم والاقتداء بجمهور الصحابة رضوان الله عليهم فيها ثم من بعدهم من العلماء الذين كانوا سرج الوقت وأئمة الهدى لأخذ السنن المنتشرة بها عنهم فكان كل ثابت الإيمان منشرح الصدر به يرحل إليها ثم بعد ذلك في كل وقت إلى زماننا لزيارة قبر النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم والتبرك بمشاهده وآثاره وآثار أصحابه الكرام فلا يأتيها إلا مؤمن هذا كلام القاضي

It is even allowed to travel for graves of Awliya!

Translation: Qadhi Iyaad (rah) said: The Messenger of Allah (Peace be upon him) said: (Imaan) returns to Madina, this means that the attribute of Faith in the beginning and last would remain same, because in the beginning of Islam every person whose Faith and Islam were pure they used to visit Madina as an immigrant or just for the sight of Prophet (Peace be upon him), or to learn from Prophet or to attain his nearness. Then in the time of Khulafa ar Rashideen the People with faith had the same attitude so that they can learn justice from them as the rule of majority of Companions was also there (in Madina). After the rightly guided caliphs, the scholars who were Lamps and Imams of guidance kept on coming to gather Prophetic sayings from them, therefore every true believer who was firm in belief kept on travelling towards Madina, then after these Scholars till today people come for “Ziyarah of Grave of Prophet (Peace be upon him) in order to obtain Blessings (Tabarruk) from left overs of Prophet and Sahaba” so Only that person comes to Madina who is a true believer.[Sharh Sahih Muslim by Imam al-Nawawi (2/144), Published by Dar ul Fikr, Beirut, Lebanon]

Mullah Ali Qari (rah) quotes Imam al Ghazzali (rah) the Proof of Islam who in his exceptional work Ihya Uloom ud Din said: ” In my sight this hadith actually orders to visit Maqabir of Saliheen” because Prophet (Peace be upon him) said: I used to forbid you from visiting graves but now I allow you [Agreed upon], however in the hadith [travelling to 3 mosques] it is forbidden to travel to other mosques ‘’just for the sake of seeking more Thawaab’’, so except for these three Masajid thawaab in every other mosque is same, as a matter of fact there is no population on earth where they don’t have a masjid so why would anyone specifically travel to a mosque which is far for attaining more thawaab, “but the Maqabir are not equal in virtue rather the virtue of visiting them depends on the piety.

The Forgery of Salafis caught once again!

..and virtue of the one who is burined inside the Qabr, It is a shame that some people forbid travelling towards qaboor of even Ibrahim (a.s), Hadrat Musa (a.s) and Hadrat Yahya (a.s), to stop others from visiting qaboor is a strange act [Mullah Ali Qari, Mirqat Sharh al Mishqaat (2/190)]

This leaves behind no doubt that not only travelling to visit graves of Prophets but also “TRAVELING TO VISIT GRAVES OF AWLIYA” is allowed in sight of greatest commentators of Sahihayn and leading authorities, so according to Salafis not only Ibn Taymiyyah should become Bidati but also all these great scholars should turn out to be Mushrikeen who allowed travelling to visit the “SHRINES OF AWLIYA”

The outrageous verdict of Ibn Taymiyyah is so blindly followed by Salafis that they even forged the text of Imam al Nawawi (rah) and everywhere Imam Nawawi mentioned “QABR” they changed it to “MOSQUE” in order to make him correspond to fatwa of Ibn Taymiyyah (i.e. it is fine to make intention for mosque but not grave)

Imam al Mujtahid Muhayuddin Abi Zakriyyah Yahya bin Sharaf al Nawawi (Rahimuhullah) said in his Kitab al Adhkaar:

They forged to text to defend Ibn Taymiyyah

Translation: “Section: The Visit to the Tomb of the Messenger of Allah (Allah Bless Him and Give Him Peace), and the Remembrances of Allah Made There”

Know that “Everyone” who performs the hajj “Should set out” (اعلم أنه ينبغي لكل من حجّ)to visit the Messenger of Allah(Allah bless him and give him peace), “Whether it is on one’s way or not” (سواء كان ذلك طريقه أو لم يكن), for visiting him (Allah bless him and give him peace) is one of the most important acts of worship, the most rewarded of efforts, and best of goals.

When one sets out to perform the visit, one should do much of the blessings and peace upon him (Allah bless him and give him peace) on the way. And when one’s eye falls on the trees of Medina, and its sanctum and landmarks, one should increase saying the blessings and peace upon the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), “Asking Allah Most High to benefit one by one’s visit to him” (Allah bless him and give him peace) [وسألَ اللّه تعالى أن ينفعَه بزيارته صلى اللّه عليه وسلم], and grant one felicity in this world and the next through it. One should say, “O Allah, open for me the doors of Your mercy, and bestow upon me, through the visit to the tomb of Your prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace)[اللَّهُمَّ افْتَحْ عَليَّ أبْوَابَ رَحْمَتِكَ وَارْزُقْنِي في زِيارَةِ قَبْرِ نَبِيِّكَ], that which You have bestowed upon Your friends, those who obey You. Forgive me and show me mercy, O Best of Those Asked” (Imam al-Nawawi in Kitab ul-Adhkar, Page # 178)

Conclusion!

Now Salafis not only forged the translation but they forged the actual Arabic of this statement, they changed “EVERYONE SHOULD” into “IT IS PREFERABLE” and everywhere there is mention of “GRAVE” they changed it to “MOSQUE” and finally they removed the whole passage in which Imam Nawawi (rah) is proving “WASEELA” through Prophet (Peace be upon him).

This forgery has been done in the 1409/1988 printing of this work, published by Dar al-Huda in Riyad, Saudi Arabia, under the inspection and approval of the Riyasa Idara al-Buhuth al-‘Ilmiyya wa al-Ifta’ or “Presidency of Supervision of Scholarly Studies and Islamic Legal Opinion but they were caught doing cheating red-handed.

Now the Salafis instead of running towards Aqwaal of Ulama should concentrate on the sayings of Ibn Taymiyyah himself, and they should stop doing taqlid and accept openly that Ibn Taymiyyah was a misguided Bidati.

Ibn Taymiyyah contradicts the Prophet

In another community this same asim guy is arguing with couple of ignorant people that this following wording of Ibn Taymiyyah as said in his book At-Tawassul wal Waseela:

وكذلك الأنبياء والصالحون، وإن كانوا أحياء في قبورهم،

It means: Similarly the prophets and righteous people, and even if they were alive in their graves…

Here asim is himself trying to claim that Ibn Taymiyyah was not sure about Hayaat of Anbiya in their respective graves, asim is proudly claiming that Ibn Taymiyyah used the wording “EVEN IF”

Now here is reply from Prophet (Peace be upon him)

حدثنا أبو الجهم الأزرق بن علي حدثنا يحيى بن أبي بكير حدثنا المستلم بن سعيد عن الحجاج عن ثابت البناني عن أنس بن مالك : قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم : الأنبياء أحياء في قبورهم يصلون
إسناده صحيح
رواه أبو يعلى والبزار ورجال أبي يعلى ثقات

Translation: On the authority of Anas the Prophet (Peace be upon him) said: The Prophets are alive in their graves and praying [Musnad Abu Ya’la with Sahih Isnad, Volume No.6, Page No. 147, Hadith No. 3428] –

Imam al-Haythami after this hadith said: Abu Ya’la and Bazzar narrated it and all the narrators of Abu Ya’la are“THIQA” [Majma al Zawaid Volume 8, Page No. 386, Hadith No. 13812]

So I give full credit to Asim that Ibn Taymiyyah said “EVEN IF” but on the other hand our beloved Prophet (Peace be upon him) is clearly saying that “PROPHETS ARE ALIVE AND PRAYING IN THEIR GRAVES” so Salafis may Ibn Taymiyyah be Mubarak to you whereas Prophet (Peace be upon him) is ours and we are followers of Quran and Sunnah whereas you people blindly follow Ibn Taymiyyah.

Reply to a confused person called Hunter!

Let me refute this person called hunter along, incase people do not know him then let me introduce him. This Hunter guy who also has a fake profile with name of Zulqarnain he claims to be “Hanafi Muqalid who does tark of Raf al Yaddain (note raful yaddain is the top most masla of wahabis in fiqh)” and in Aqida he respects the stance of Sheikh ul Akbar Muhayuddin Ibn Arabi (rah), also note that Ibn Arabi (rah) is outright kafir in sight of Wahabis, this hunter also considers Ibn Taymiyyah to be deeply mistaken on variety of issues (not only in fiqh but aqida) but still he keeps on defending Ibn Taymiyyah because for him Aqida is not important but love of Ibn Taymiyyah is.

He himself said after seeing the absurd aqida of Ibn Taymiyyah comparing Allah to the moon/sun: Note: I personally disagree with the statement of Sheikh ul Islam but even it is not Shirk Because Imam Abu Hanifa Hold the Same Belief (that of Ibn e Taymiya (RA)).

Alhamdulillah he first accepted to disagree with this absurd aqida of Ibn Taymiyyah, but in the same passage he made a big Buhtaan on Imam al Adham Abu Hanifa (rah) that he had the same belief that Allah comes in-front of us just like Sun and Moon come infront of us… Audhobillah Min Dhalik, now hunter please do not sidetrack and go towards other issues, first prove that Imam Abu Hanifa (rah) also said that Allah’s existence is like that of Moon/Sun coming infront of us!

The Lord of Ibn Taymiyyah puts his Foot in Hell!

This is just the beginning and I wanted Salafis to come towards teachings of Ibn Taymiyyah. They often misguide people by quoting other scholars but they always hide the actual teachings of Ibn Taymiyyah because they know teachings of Ibn Taymiyyah were absurd.

Now here is another shocker for Salafis.

It states in same “Sharh al Aqidat-il-Wastiyyah”

The Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) says that people will be constantly thrown into Hell but it will go on asking if there are some more. Thus, Allah the Lord of Might “WILL PUT HIS FOOT IN IT” and in one narrative it has occoured that “HE WILL PUT HIS STEP IN IT” and Hell get contracted and say, ‘Enough, enough.’ (Al-Bukhari 6/353)

(Ibn Taymiyyah explained): The Hadith afffirms that Allah possesses “FEET AND STEPS” and this attribute is exactly like other attributes. This will be proved worthy of the Grandeur of Allah. The rationale behind putting “THE STEP INTO HELL” is that Allah has promised that He will fill up Hell. [Sharh al-Aqidat-il-Wastiyah, Page No. 136, Published by Dar us Salaam, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia]

Here Ibn Taymiyyah is literally affirming that Allah will place his foot “IN HELL” Audhobillah Min Dhalik whereas classical scholars have rightly explained that Al-Qadam mentioned in this hadith refers to “PREVIOUS ONES” like we say “Mutaqadimeen”

Hafidh Ibn al-Jawzi (rah) explains this hadith as:

In considering this hadith, it is our duty to believe that God’s essence, Mighty and Majestic, does not divide into parts, “PLACE CANNOT CONTAIN IT” and it cannot be characterized by change and going from one place to another. Abu Ubayd al-Harawi (rah) related that Hasan al-Basri (rah) said: “Al-Qadam (literally a foot)” is a reference to “THOSE FROM THE WORST OF GOD’S CREATURES WHO HAVE BEEN EARMARKED AND DESIGNATED FOR HELL…

Abu Manzur al-Azhari (rah) said: “Al-Qadam” are those who have been preordained to reside everlastingly in the Fire. And things that have been placed out in front are refered to in Arabic as “Qadam” while things that have been demolished are called “Hadam” … How feeble minded this belief is (of Allah literally putting foot in hell)! Be it “FAR REMOVED FROM THE CREATOR” ..GOD IS EXALTED ABOVE THE FOOLISHNESS OF THOSE WHO LIKEN HIM TO A HUMAN BODY” [Ibn Jawzi in Daf’ Shubah al-Tashbih bi-Akaff al-Tanzih, Page No.78-80]

So Shame on Ibn Taymiyyah for literally putting the foot of Allah in Hell fire … AstaghfirUllah!

Ibn Taymiyyah’s hatred for Ahlul Bayt

After proving his absurd Aqida about Existance of Allah being like Sun/Moon (Naudhobillah), Allah literally putting his “FEET IN HELL FIRE” (Naudhobillah) and his utter disrespect in court of Prophet (Peace be upon him) by forbidding even travel to visit his grave.

Now let me come towards his disrespect in the court of Ahlul Bayt.

The Ahlus Sunnah wal Jammah and even Salafis of today accept the hadith of Prophet (Peace be upon him) which states: “For Whosoever I am Mawla then Ali is his Mawla: References: Sunnan Tirmidhi 6:79 (#3713), Sunnan Ibn Majah (Hadith # 124), Musnad Ahmed bin Hanbal (Hadith # 642, 953, 964, 1323, 18967, 22563,22724, 22760) Sunnan Nasai al Kubra (Hadith # 8051), Mussanaf Ibn Abi Shaybah (Hadith # 27808) and many others.

This hadith is narrated by so many companions that it is “MUTAWATTIR” however Ibn Taymiyyah being ignorant as he was declared this hadith as “DAEEF AND FORGED” and this proves his utter hatred for Mawla Ali (ra)

Even Nasir ud-din Albani after declaring this hadith as “SAHIH” exposed Ibn Taymiyyah on this issue and said:

Nasir ud-din Albani exposes Ibn Taymiyyah’s ignorance in hadith methodology

أنني رأيت شيخ الإسلام بن تيمية , قد ضعف الشطر الأول من الحديث , و أما
الشطر الآخر , فزعم أنه كذب! و هذا من مبالغته الناتجة في تقديري من تسرعه
في تضعيف الأحاديث قبل أن يجمع طرقها و يدقق النظر فيها

Translation: When I saw Sheikh ul Islam Ibn Taymiyah considering the Hadith (For whosoever I am Mawla then Ali is his Mawla) as weak/doubtful in its first half and “LIE IN ITS SECOND” then I had to write in length over this issue. In my viewpoint, the reason behind such exaggeration (of Ibn Taymiyah) was that he used to be hasty in deciding the inauthenticity of some Hadiths before seeing them properly [Silsilat ul Ahadith as-Sahiha, Volume No.4, Page No. 344]

Now this is the worth of Ibn Taymiyyah that even Albani exposed him and proved him hasty !

The misquotation by blind lover of Ibn Taymiyyah

A person with the name of hunter cleverly quoted Fiqh al Akbar and said:Now I don’t Want batil Taweelat of this clearcut statement, Neither one should utter the silly statement like Fiqh ul Akbar Was Not Written By Imam Abu Hanifa

Please note at the red highlighted part, now the same person asim whom hunter is praising, he said to me on phone that Fiqh ul Akbar is not written by Imam Abu Hanifa (rah), so hunter your own guru rejects Fiqh ul akbar when things go against him and this proves double faced nature of your wahabi sect. I ask hunter to provide me the complete chain of book Fiqh ul Akbar reaching back to Imam al Azam Abu Hanifa (rah)

Secondly nowhere is it mentioned in your reference that Allah will literally put his foot in hell fire, (Naudhobillah), I have explained through Imam al Hafidh Ibn Jawzi (rah) that Allah is pure of such a thing and the literal meaning of Qadam will not be taken.

Anyways Hunter misquoted from Fiqh ul Akbar, actually same book has negated this but as obviously people like hunter can only misquote to fool people.

It states right before the passage which hunter blindly quoted: God knows, but not as we know; He has power, but not as we have power; He sees, but not as we see; He hears, but not as we hear; and He speaks, but not as we speak. We speak by means of the speech organs and sounds, whereas God Most High speaks with “NEITHER ORGANS NOR SOUNDS” Sounds are created, and the word of God Most High is uncreated. He is a thing, but unlike other things; by saying “thing,” we intend merely to affirm His reality. ”HE HAS NEITHER A BODY NOR SUBSTANCE, NEITHER ACCIDENTAL PROPERYY NOR LIMIT”, neither opposite nor like nor similitude. [Fiqh al Akbar. Point # 4]
.

Why did you hide this part mr hunter? Without this part the next part which you quoted is meaningless rather this does Nafi of next…

Ibn Taymiyyah changing the wording of hadith

So even if assuming Fiqh ul Akbar is written by Imam Abu Hanifa, It does not mean he had similar aqida like Ibn Taymiyyah the anthropomorphist. And kindly tell me do you really believe that “ALLAH SHALL LITERALLY PUT HIS FOOT IN HELL FIRE” is this the Allah you worship who puts his foot in hell fire literally (Naudhobillah)?

Above all how on earth did Ibn Taymiyyah change a “Singular foot” into “PLURAL FEET” this itself proves extreme Tajseem of Ibn Taymiyyah and he ventured out of Ahlus Sunnah by making taweel (i.e. chainging singal foot into plural feet)

Ibn Taymiyyah’s hatred for Sayyidah Fatima (ra)

Now It is clear that Ibn Taymiyyah was an anthropomorphist and also degrader of Prophet (Peace be upon him), so let us again come towards his disrespect towards Ahlul Bayt.

He (Ibn Taimiyah) Writes:

فإن أبا بكر إمام ل يتصرف لنفسه بل للمسلمين ، والمال لم يأخذه لنفسه بل للمسلمين، وفاطمة تطلب لنفسها

Translation: Verily Abu Bakr is an Imam who did not act for himself but for the Muslims and as for the money, he did not take it for himself but for the Muslimswhilst Fatima was demanding it for her “NAFS” [Minhaj al-Sunnah, Volume 005, Page No. 522]

Audhobillah Min Dhalik !!… Remember It is correct to say that Sayyidna Abu Bakr (ra) was right in his perspective because he knew from Rusul Ullah (Salallaho alaihi wasalam) that property of Anbiya is not inherited but this does not mean we say that Fatima (ra) was asking for money for her “NAFS” This will actually be direct Ghustakhi of Prophet (Peace be upon him) because he said in a rigorously authentic hadith:

Volume 5, Book 57, Number 61: (Sahih Bukhari)

Narrated Al-Miswar bin Makhrama: Allah’s Apostle said, “Fatima is a part of me, andhe who makes her angry, makes me angry.”

Shah Abdul Aziz in Fatawa Azizi Volume 2 page 79:

“The pen of Ibn Taymeeya in Minhaaj at some points is so atrocious, in particular his views on Ahl’ul bayt where he has sought to play down their merits, prohibits visiting the tomb of Rasulullah (s), is opposed to Saints and condemns the Sufis. According to the views of Ahl’ul Sunnah his pen is cursed, his writings cannot deemed to be those of the Ahl’ul Sunnah”

-

Ibn Hajar al Haytami said in his al-Fatawa al-Hadithiyya (pp. 47-49) :

“Ibn Taymiyya was a servant whom Allah abandoned, misguided, blinded, deafened, and humiliated. This has been frankly expressed by the Imams who explained the corruptness of how he was, and the mendacity of what he said. Whoever wants tocheck this should read the words of the Mujtahid Imam, whose Imamate, greatness, and having reached the rank of Ijtihad are universally acknowledged, Abul Hasan (Taqi al-Din) al-Subki; together with his son Taj (al-Din as-Subki), Imam al-’Izz Ibn Jama’a, the scholars of their time, and other Shafi’i, Maliki and Hanafi scholars.

__________________

Ibn Taimiyah believed that Genus is eternal

We read in Dare Tarud al-Aqel wa al-Naqel by ibn Taimiyah, Volume 1 page 310:

وأما أكثر أهل الحديث ومن وافقهم فإنهم لا يجعلون النوع حادثا بل قديما
Verily the majority of Ahlulhadith and who ever agrees with them, don’t consider Genus as created, nay they believe it to be eternal.

Ibn Taimiyah believed in the extinguishing of hell fire
We read in al-Beshara wa al-Ethaf by Allamah Hassan al-Saqqaf, page 13:

ثبت ان ابن تيمية يقول بفناء النار
“It is proven that ibn Taimiyah believed in the extinguishing of hell fire.”

Ibn Taimiyah believed that the prophet will sit next to Allah (swt) on the throne
Majmo’a al-Fatawa, Volume 4 page 374:

فَقَدْ حَدَثَ الْعُلَمَاءُ الْمَرْضِيُّونَ وَأَوْلِيَاؤُهُ الْمَقْبُولُونَ : أَنَّ مُحَمَّدًا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يُجْلِسُهُ رَبُّهُ عَلَى الْعَرْشِ مَعَهُ .
The reliable and acceptable scholars narrated that, God shall make Muhammad the messenger of Allah sit next to Him [swt] on the throne.
Al-Nahr al-Mad by Abu Hayan, Volume 1 page 254:

وقرأت في كتاب لأحمد بن تيمية هذا الذي عاصرنا وهو بخطه سماه كتاب العرش إن الله تعالى يجلس